Before You Sign Anything: A Singapore Law Firm Checklist for Founders

Before You Sign Anything: A Singapore Law Firm Checklist for Founders and Investors

The term sheet landed in a tech founder's inbox on a Thursday afternoon. SGD 2 million at a SGD 8 million valuation, signed by the lead investor, countersignature pending. The founder had 72 hours to review before the deadline and had not yet engaged a lawyer. He forwarded the term sheet to a corporate lawyer at a Singapore law firm with experience in venture deals—and within 24 hours, the lawyer had flagged three provisions that would have materially diluted the founder's control at Series A. The deadline was renegotiated. The provisions were revised.

The scenario is not unusual. Singapore's legal landscape — spanning the Payment Services Act 2019, the Copyright Act 2021, the Singapore Takeover Code, the Companies Act, and cross-border contract law — is dense enough that a first-time founder or high-net-worth investor who treats legal review as a formality rather than a necessity tends to discover the gaps at the worst possible moment: during a funding round, a shareholder dispute, or an MAS licensing application.

This checklist covers the legal essentials that every founder and investor in Singapore should have reviewed before signing anything material. It is not legal advice — it is the map of what a qualified Singapore law firm covers in a proper engagement.

Photo by George Morina on Pexels

Payment Services Act 2019 — Does It Apply to Your Business?

The Payment Services Act 2019 (PSA) is the primary regulatory framework for payment services in Singapore, administered by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS). Any entity conducting digital payment token (DPT) services, e-money issuance, or cross-border transfers in Singapore may require a PSA licence — either as a Standard Payment Institution (SPI) or Major Payment Institution (MPI), depending on monthly transaction volumes.

For founders building fintech platforms, crypto exchanges, or payment infrastructure — and for family office structures with digital asset exposure — the PSA is not optional compliance. It is the structural foundation. MAS licensing applications typically run for several months and involve detailed regulatory business plans, AML/CFT policy documentation, and ongoing supervision obligations. Founders who discover PSA applicability during Series A due diligence, rather than at the pre-incorporation stage, face significant restructuring costs.

Pre-application engagement with MAS is available and recommended. A Singapore law firm with a FinTech practice can help characterise your business activities under the PSA before you commit to a corporate structure that creates licensing gaps.

Copyright Act 2021 — Who Actually Owns Your Company's IP?

Singapore's Copyright Act was substantially amended in 2021. The revised Act provides explicit provisions for AI-assisted works and updated the framework for digital content creators — both increasingly relevant as AI tools become embedded in how technology companies build and ship product.

For founders and corporate clients, the critical provision is section 25 of the Copyright Act: copyright in a work created by an employee in the course of employment vests in the employer. For contractors, consultants, and part-time staff — including technical co-founders who build early-stage product before formal employment contracts are executed — copyright vests in the creator unless there is an explicit written assignment. This means a developer who builds the first version of your product under a consultancy agreement without an IP assignment clause may technically own the copyright to code your company is commercialising.

QWP's IP practice handles trademark portfolio management, brand strategy, and copyright enforcement. An IP lawyer reviewing your contractor agreements and employment contracts at incorporation is a straightforward and inexpensive step that prevents significant legal exposure at fundraising.

Photo by Pavel Danilyuk on Pexels

The Companies Act Foundation — Model Constitution vs. Shareholders Agreement

Under the Companies Act (Chapter 50), every Singapore private limited company adopts a constitution. By default, the ACRA Model Constitution governs — filed with ACRA, publicly visible on BizFile+, and binding on all members and directors.

A shareholders agreement (SHA) — colloquially called a shareholder contract — sits on top of the constitution. It is private, contractual, and binds only the parties who sign it. The two documents work differently: the Model Constitution governs the corporate machinery (director powers, share transfer restrictions, meeting procedures), while the SHA governs the economic relationship between shareholders (preference share terms, anti-dilution provisions, drag-along rights, founder vesting).

The critical risk in DIY SHA drafting is that bespoke economic terms can exist in the SHA but not in the Model Constitution — and if the two documents conflict, the public constitution generally takes precedence over a private contract in a court dispute. Founders who use generic templates without mapping their SHA to the Model Constitution frequently end up with provisions that are unenforceable in exactly the scenario where they matter most: when the parties are no longer aligned.

A corporate lawyer from an experienced Singapore law firm can identify which protections need to appear in both documents, which are SHA-only, and how your cap table structure interacts with the Takeover Code (discussed below).

Photo by Sora Shimazaki on Pexels

Singapore Takeover Code — It Applies to More Private Companies Than Founders Think

The Singapore Takeover Code (formally the Code on Takeovers and Mergers) is administered by MAS and applies to offers for public companies whose shares are listed or quoted on a securities exchange. However, Section 21 of the Securities and Futures Act extends the Code to unlisted public companies with more than 50 shareholders — capturing more private companies than founders and investors generally realise.

Once the Code applies, the 30% threshold matters: any person who acquires 30% or more of the voting shares of a company subject to the Code must make a mandatory general offer for the remaining shares. Between 20% and 30%, any acquisition of more than 1% in any 12-month period also triggers a mandatory offer.

For founders with angel investors, secondary share transactions, and early employee option pools, the Takeover Code interacts with SHA provisions — drag-along rights, transfer restrictions, and anti-dilution triggers — in ways that require careful structuring. A corporate and M&A lawyer from a Singapore law firm with takeover advisory experience can ensure the two frameworks do not conflict at a transaction moment.

When Engaging a Law Firm Stops Being Optional

The checklist above covers situations that are common across the Singapore business landscape: fintech licensing, founder equity disputes, investor rights conflicts, and regulatory threshold triggers. None of them are resolved well by template documents or retrospective legal reviews.

Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC (UEN 200911430C) is a boutique multi-disciplinary Singapore law firm with a Corporate & Commercial practice, a FinTech and Payment Services team, and a litigation practice experienced in shareholder disputes and contract law. The firm operates from offices in Singapore and Hong Kong, and is a member of Multilaw — giving clients access to coordinated legal support across ASEAN and globally.

The firm's approach combines the agility of a boutique with the breadth of a full-service practice. Chambers Asia-Pacific, Legal 500 Asia-Pacific, Benchmark Litigation, IFLR1000, and The Straits Times' Singapore's Best Law Firms 2023 have all ranked QWP's practice.

Engaging a Singapore law firm early — before the term sheet deadline, before the incorporation documents are signed, before the investor's lawyer sends the first round of comments — is consistently less expensive than untangling the disputes that result from skipping that step.

Photo by Marije Kouyzer on Pexels

Frequently Asked Questions

Is QWP a legally registered Singapore law firm?
Yes. Quahe Woo & Palmer LLC (UEN 200911430C) is a limited liability law corporation registered with The Law Society of Singapore, incorporated in 2009. The principal office is at 510 Thomson Road, #08-00 SLF Building, Singapore 298135. Call +65 6622 0366 to verify credentials.

What fee structures does QWP offer?
QWP offers hourly rates for complex matters (litigation, M&A, regulatory), fixed fees for predictable matters (incorporation, wills, uncontested divorce), and capped fees where scope is clear but cost exposure needs limiting. A written fee estimate covering professional fees and disbursements is provided before substantive work commences.

Does QWP serve international clients and family offices?
Yes. With offices in Singapore and Hong Kong and membership in Multilaw, QWP handles cross-border matters including multi-jurisdictional M&A, family office structuring, international arbitration, and Singapore cryptocurrency and FinTech licensing for global clients.

Can QWP advise on PSA licensing for crypto and payment platforms?
Yes. QWP's FinTech practice handles MAS licensing under the Payment Services Act, including DPT service characterisation, pre-application engagement with MAS, AML/CFT policy drafting, and ongoing regulatory compliance.

For matters ranging from a Singapore incorporation and shareholder agreement to a complex cross-border family office restructure or an MAS licensing application, contact QWP at qwp.sg/contact-us or call +65 6622 0366 during office hours (Monday–Friday, 9am–6pm SGT).